We spent a while looking up three items each and to take notes on it. The information we found most interesting was the how heavy the space shuttle weighed. The research was somewhat confusing because different cites showed different answers.
Science Bibliography
"NASA - Home." NASA - Home. N.p., n.d. Web. 15 Jan. 2010.
http://nosheep.net/wp-content/upload/EUVE_satellite.gif
http://sc.gov/NR/rdonlyres/93C9CEAE-361E-4F3B-B4C4-
CEDD151A6321/2769/FloatingHubble.jpg
http://scrapetv.com/News/News%20Pages/Science/Images/international- space-station.jpg
http://scrapetv.com/News/News%20Pages/Science/Images/space-shuttle- endeavour-launch-2.jpg
http://static.howstuffworks.com/gif/space-suit-mmua.jpg
http://www.colorado.edu/StudentGroups/CUSEDS/Events/WSW/2007/sputnik.jpg
http://www.freedesign4.me/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/free-vector- country-flags.jpg
http://www.made-in-china.com/image/2f0j00vCBTQWMqbtoKM/Telescope- F90060M-F80060M.jpg
http://www.ph.surrey.ac.uk/astrophysics/files/hubble.gif
http://www.physics.udel.edu/~gizis/pictures/SIRTF_ir_1small.jpg
Great video, how long did it take you to make this movie? I really liked the facts!
ReplyDeleteJoe Henderson
It took us three classes and two resources to finish.
ReplyDeleteGreat job! Many different facts! I really liked it
ReplyDeleteGood job! It was awesome but where did your voice go Gabby?
ReplyDeleteI think that it was a good video but I could not read barely any of the facts because the quality was horrible.
ReplyDeleteI couldn't really read the facts, but it was good video.
ReplyDeleteReally good job on this project. I liked all the facts and I can see that you guys put in a lot of work to make this great video.
ReplyDelete-Parker
I had trouble reading all of the facts because the quality was bad, but otherwise it was a great video. I thought it was cool that every telescope and sattelite was named after a certain person too.
ReplyDeleteGreat job a lot of information. I liked it. YOu can tell you worked hard on it.
ReplyDeleteI really like the facts that were put into this video. But as some of the people have said, I couldn't read some of the facts, or it was just difficult.
ReplyDeleteYour video had many interesting facts. Some of the text was hard to read though so i couldn't read some facts but the ones i could read were very informational.
ReplyDeleteThe facts were interesting but it was extremely hard to read almost all of them. It was overall still a good photostory.
ReplyDelete-Kyle Knutson
The facts that I could read were good; otherwise there was really bad quality between the picture and the text. Also, weren't you supposed to relate this to October sky?
ReplyDeleteI couldn't read hardly any of the facts. Though the ones I could read were informational, I could only read about half of them and that made it hard to answer the questions. Also, how does what you said in this video relate to October Sky?
ReplyDeleteI couldn't really read any of the facts but it was still really good.
ReplyDeleteLike Amanda said, the information that was readable was good, but I couldn't read a lot at all.
ReplyDeleteThere was a lot of good information that was presented during this presentation, but I could not read a lot of the text. It was either blurry or the colors were to bright. It was kind of difficult to answer the questions because I couldn't read all of the facts.
ReplyDeleteGood information but hard to see at some points. Overall it was good and i learned alot. Thanks.
ReplyDeletei couldn't read the facts at all.
ReplyDeleteNice information about NASA and how they created house held products. It was also cool learning about the sapce suit that can take on extreme temps. The text was a little hard to read for me but it was still a great job.
ReplyDelete